|
The resurgence of
malaria and the rise of more dangerous forms of the disease have led
scientists to recommend a return to common-sense control practices not
widely used in more than half a century.
Malaria, which
health officials considered defeated in the 1950s and early 1960s, is
making a comeback, especially in Sub-Saharan Africa. The World Health
Organization estimates that up to 300 million people a year are
stricken with the disease, which typically produces high fevers and
extreme flu-like symptoms. Children suffer the vast majority of
malaria-related deaths, some 1 million last year alone.
Malaria’s
resurgence, researchers say, is associated in large part with an
expansion of irrigated agriculture that provides breeding sites for
the mosquitoes that carry the malaria parasite.
"A link
between irrigation and malaria has been suspected since the beginning
of the last century," says Clifford Mutero a health and water
management researcher with the International Water Management
Institute (IWMI), one of the 16 Future Harvest food and environmental
research centers.
A recent study
published in Science magazine estimates that the severest form
of the disease emerged around 7,000 years ago, placing it at a
crossroads with early agriculture.
"For as long
as people have been irrigating crops and watering livestock they’ve
had to contend with the disease," Mutero says. "The link between
irrigated tropical agriculture, and malaria is pretty convincing, so
it makes sense to try to attack the problem at the source."
Common
Sense Practices
In the 20th
century, the building of the Panama Canal was made possible only when
health experts began to understand the link between sanitation, the
life cycle of the mosquito, and human health.
Malaria and
yellow fever were brought under control not with drugs or pesticides,
Mutero notes, but by controlling the breeding environment of
disease-carrying mosquitoes.
This type of
control, which scientists call environmental management, was largely
abandoned with the advent of insecticides such as DDT and drugs that
keep malaria in check. Since then, the parasite that causes the
disease has largely gained immunity to the drugs, and mosquitoes that
spread malaria are now all but immune to ordinary pesticides.
"The
widespread use of chemicals in the 1950s and 60s," Mutero says,
"severed the link that helped farmers pass on common sense malaria
control practices to the next generation."
Irrigation:
a Major Culprit?
"After World
War II, public health officials believed that malaria could be best
controlled with drugs and insecticides, the silver bullets of malaria
control," says Eline Boelee, an IWMI irrigation and health researcher.
The development of DDT and chloroquine, a widely used malaria drug,
led to complacency, she says.
At about the
same time, developing countries and international aid agencies began
investing in large-scale irrigation and agriculture development
projects, which set in motion the conditions needed for a resurgence
of the disease.
"When
irrigation schemes open up," says Boelee, "people move in to take
advantage of the water. But providing farmers with year-round water
also changes the natural ecology, and anytime agriculture expands or
intensifies it has an effect on human health," she says.
"That is why
it is important to focus research on areas where malaria and
agriculture connect," Mutero says. "Our aim is to help development
agencies plan agricultural activities so that they won’t increase the
risk of disease. Right now these links are not well understood."
Researchers at
the Water Institute believe the best strategy for malaria control is a
combination of good environmental management practices, sound
government policy, and active involvement by local communities.
"There are
lots of ways to control malaria that don’t involve spraying pesticides
or developing new vaccines," Boelee adds. "Fitting mosquito-proof
screens on houses, using cows or other warm blooded animals as decoys,
and promoting the use of bed nets can help people to avoid infection,"
she says.
In China, rice
farmers combat mosquitoes by periodically letting the water run dry in
their rice paddies and then refilling them as the crop matures. This
denies mosquitoes the standing water they need to mature and breed.
Boelee
believes that increasing levels of nutrition can also help to defeat
malaria. "People who eat a more balanced diet," she says, "are better
equipped to fight off disease".
New
Consortium—SIMA
"There are
lots of ideas about how to control malaria. What we’ve needed is a way
to organize the bits and pieces," says Mutero.
To achieve
that goal, the Future Harvest Centers recently agreed to form a
research consortium that will bring together scientists working in
agriculture, health, and public policy.
The
consortium, known as the Systemwide Initiative on Malaria and
Agriculture, or SIMA, is a partnership between international and
national organizations working in malaria and agriculture. In addition
to Future Harvest Centers, the partners include a variety of UN
agencies, the Kenya-based International Center of Insect Physiology
and Ecology, and the Danish Bilharziasis Laboratory. In addition to
IWMI, Future Harvest Center stakeholders include the International
Food Policy Research Institute, The International Plant Genetic
Resources Institute, the West Africa Rice Development Association ,
the International Centre for Research in Agroforestry.
The Future Harvest Centers,
Mutero says, will contribute scientific expertise on the food
production and environment, as well as dozens of well-organized
research sites where field studies can be conducted in different
agro-environments.
The
Initiative, he says, will focus first on projects aimed at developing
a set of best practices to reduce malaria infection around small
rainwater harvesting reservoirs and large-scale irrigation systems.
"Right now
hundreds of millions of dollars are being spent on developing a
vaccine and on social marketing programs aimed at getting people to
purchase bed nets," Mutero says. "Not much is being done to control
the problem at the source."
Until an
effective vaccine is available, traditional approaches such as the use
of repellent plants, animal decoys, and common-sense irrigation
management are likely to provide better results at a lower price," he
adds.
The SIMA
initiative will cost an estimated US$20 million over the next six
years and will be coordinated from a secretariat based at the IWMI
office in Nairobi.
###
For more
information about SIMA contact:
s.carriger@cgiar.org
or
m.devlin@cgiar.org
The
International Water Management Institute is a scientific research
organization working to improve water and land resources management
for food, livelihoods, and nature. IWMI works with partners in
developing countries to develop tools and methods to help eradicate
poverty through more effective management of water and land resources.
IWMI's work brings together hydrologists, agronomists, economists,
social scientists, environmental researchers, and health experts on
multidisciplinary research projects. It is the only organization of
its kind that is fully dedicated to providing the scientific basis
necessary to help developing countries reduce poverty through more
effective management of their water and land resources.http://www.iwmi.org/
Future Harvest
(http://www.futureharvest.org/)
is a global nonprofit organization that builds awareness and support
for food and environmental research for a world with less poverty, a
healthier human family, well-nourished children, and a better
environment. Future Harvest supports research, promotes partnerships,
and sponsors projects that bring the results of research to rural
communities, farmers, and families in Africa, Latin America, and Asia.
Future Harvest is an initiative of the 16 food and environmental
research centers that are primarily funded through the Consultative
Group on International Agricultural Research (http://www.cgiar.org/).
|